Laparoscopy Hospital
Search World Laparoscopy Hospital
Contact Us
Click call for Free
Live Chat
World Laparoscopy Hospital

   Review Article: | Download PDF

Next Article


LAPAROSCOPIC BURCH SUSPENSION: IS THERE A ROLE AFTER EMERGENCE OF TENSION- FREE VAGINAL TAPE IN THE TREATMENT OF STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE?

DR. MARY ANNE QUE-VILLARIN, DMAS CEBU, PHILIPPINES

Project to be submitted towards completion of Diploma in Minimal Access Surgery                                     

INTRODUCTION

Genuine Stress Incontinence is the involuntary loss of urine, which occurs when the intravesical pressure exceeds the maximum urethral pressure in the absence of a detrusor contraction [1]. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women is an entity that presents high prevalence and significant medical, social and psychological consequences. This is a common problem and approximately 20 –30% of women complain of involuntary loss of urine on some occasion during their lifetimes.

         Many modes of treatment have been devised to rectify the negative impact of urinary incontinence on an individual’s quality of life. These include both medical therapy and surgical procedures. Surgical treatment offers the highest cure rate (85-90%) when compared to medical options [20]. Burch procedure has been the gold standard for operative treatment of urinary incontinence.  In the recent years, trends in gynecological surgery were toward minimally invasive surgical procedures for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence and have been made available for clinical use. It is associated with shorter hospital stay period, lower indexes of complications and faster rehabilitation of patients led to the development of laparoscopic surgery.

In 1991, Vancaillie & Schuessler described the Burch surgery by laparoscopic approach and performed with a technique similar to conventional surgery [2]. In the recent years, laparoscopic Burch colposuspension have become more popular and gives the best chance of surgical treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Use of the laparoscope at colposuspension enables the suprapubic approach to the bladder neck without the need for laparotomy and may confer advantages in postoperative recovery [3].  Advantages of the laparoscopic approach include elimination of the abdominal incision, and better visual access and exposure of the anatomic structures of the space of Retzius. The visual clarity and magnification of tissues gives permission to more precise dissection and refined hemostasis. The patient typically experiences much less discomfort and pain postoperatively, has quicker recovery and shorter hospital stay. Postoperative complications including wound infection, retropubic hematoma, and detrusor instability may be reduced.

         In the year 1990 at Scandinavia, Petros and Ulmsten developed a new theory, the midurethra concept, also called the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure. This was thought to work by providing pubourethral “neoligaments,” which give support to the midurethra so that increased intra-abdominal pressure results in dynamic kinking of the urethra, thus preventing urine loss. [Petros & Ulmsten] The TVT procedure has been performed for about 11 years in North America and more than that across Europe. This is inserted vaginally at the level of the midurethra with exit points suprapubically. Careful adjustment is made to avoid placing the urethra under tension. The Gynecare TVT® (Ethicon, Inc.) uses a monofilamentous type 1 mesh 30 and insertion can typically be performed as day surgery [22].

The aim of this review paper is to compare the efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape with laparoscopic Burch colposuspension in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

 MATERIALS AND METHODS

A review of literature was performed in February 2008 using search engines: Highwire Press, SpringerLink and Google. The searches used the keywords “stress urinary incontinence”, “laparoscopic Burch colposuspension” and “tension-free vaginal tape”. The queries were subsequently pooled without applying any limits. In addition, other significant studies were considered and cited in the reference lists of the selected papers. No statistical analyses have been performed. Data extraction was directly by full text of the publications in the Journals.

         To evaluate the efficacy of the two procedures, both objective (stress test, pad test) and subjective criteria (patients’ perception of the clinical improvement, expressed by validated questionnaires, institutional questionnaires, or open interview) were considered, reporting objective and subjective cure rates. For papers reporting patient outcome through the use of mixed subjective and objective end points, an ‘‘overall’’ success rate was shown.

 

RESULTS

The quality of the evaluated studies was limited.  In most papers, tension-free vaginal tape outperformed laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. 

         The study of Paraiso, et al. found that the mean operative time was significantly greater in the laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (LBC) group compared with the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) group, 132 versus 79 minutes, respectively (P 0.003). Multichannel urodynamic studies results in 32 laparoscopic Burch colposuspension and 31 TVT patients showed a higher rate of urodynamic stress incontinence at 1 year in the LBC group, 18.8% versus 3.2% (P 0.056).  There was a statistically significant improvement with respect to number of incontinence episodes, weekly pad use, and in Urogenital Distress Inventory and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire scores in both groups at 1 and 2 years after surgery (P < .001).   Times to development of symptoms for stress and urge incontinence were significantly earlier in the LBC group (P 0.02 for both symptoms). Postoperative subjective symptoms of incontinence (stress, urge, and any urinary incontinence) were reported significantly more often in the LBC group than in the TVT group (P < .04 for each category).  Estimated blood loss, change in hematocrit, analgesia requirement, hospital stay, and number of days to normal voiding were similar between groups. Total hospital cost was comparable between procedures. Complications in both groups were not significantly different [11].

         In another study done by Valpas et al., a negative stress test result was recorded in 60 (85.7%) subjects in the TVT group and 29 (56.9%) in the LBC group. The post hoc power calculation gives power 0.917. A negative 48-hour pad test result was recorded in 51 (72.9%) subjects in the TVT group and 30(58.8%) in the LBC group, which gives a post hoc power 0.300. In both groups, a significant reduction was found in the mean values of 48-hour pad test. In the TVT group, the reduction was from 82.5 grams to 3 grams, and in the LBC group, from 68.4 grams to 12.4 grams. The difference between the mean values was statistically significant in favor of TVT (3.0 g versus 12.4 g per 48 hours; 95% confidence interval CI 0.44 –18.4).  When calculating the success rates, taking into account attendees only, the stress test result was negative in 60/66 (90.9%) in the TVT group and 29/47 (61.7%) in the LBC group. The difference between these success rates was 0.292 (ie, 29.2%), with a 95% CI of 0.136 – 0.443 using Wilson’s method (two-tailed P value of .001). The 48- hour pad test result was negative in 51 of 61 (83.6%) in the TVT group and 30 of 42 (71.4%) in the LBC group. The difference between success rates was 0.122 with a 95% CI of – 0.038 – 0.288 using Wilson’s method (two tailed P value of .138).  There was a significant difference between the two procedures in Visual Analog Scale scores and in the majority of the domains in King’s College Health Questionnaire scores). In the subjects’ personal perception of the result of the procedures, there was a significant difference in favor of tension-free vaginal tape. Six women (11.8%) in the laparoscopic Burch colposuspension group used pads after the procedure; in the TVT group, nobody used pads at the time of the 1-year follow-up [10].

         Chung et al noted that the initial success rate of the laparoscopic Burch colposuspension procedure at 12- to 24-month follow-up was 90% and was favorable when compared with that of tension-free vaginal tape. However, with the test of time, the effectiveness in controlling urodynamic stress incontinence decreased and only 76.9% of the Burch group remained dry. At 48- to 60-month follow-up, in the TVT group, 90.2% were completely dry. This study demonstrates that the TVT procedure can stand the test of time, and its effectiveness over time will remain excellent [5].  A follow-up study done by Nilsson et al. on tension-free vaginal tape procedure showed that TVT was effective over a period of seven years [7].
        
         Another study done by Adile, et. al., there were clinical differences between the two methods: procedure time was 60-90 minutes for LBC and < 30 minutes for TVT. Hospitalization was 2 days and 1 day respectively. Anaesthesia given was general for LBC and local for TVT.  Invasiveness was mini for LBC and micro for TVT. The learning curve for doing the procedures: 6 months training for LBC and 15 days for TVT.  Complications: there were 2 cases (3.3%) of hematoma Retzius in LBC and 3 cases (4,4%) bladder perforations in TVT. Blood loss was absent in both methods. The Foley catheter was removed 3-4 hours after procedures in both groups while in the patients with bladder injuries there was indwelling catheter for 2 days. At 3 months follow-up all patients were completely dry. At 6-36 months follow-up in the TVT group 63 (94%) were continent, 3 patients (4%) had significant improvement, and only 1 (1.5%) failed. In the LBC group, 60 (91%) were continent, 2 (3.1%) had significant improvement, and 5 patients (7.5%) failed. In the TVT group there were 3 patients (4.5%) with de novo instability and in the LBC group, we found 2 patients (3%) with de novo instability at the post-operative follow-up [19].

DISCUSSION

         A commonly encountered problem with new and promising surgical procedures for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence is the difficulty of predicting the effectiveness of a given treatment over time [7]. This article reviews the current literature relating to laparoscopic Burch colposuspension and examines the important issues that require consideration when evaluating any surgical treatment for urinary stress incontinence. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension has gradually become a part of urogynaecological practice over the past 15 years but its true place is yet to be established. And with the advent of tension-free vaginal tape in the management of female stress urinary incontinence, the place of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension in clinical practice has become vague.

         LBC surgery has been the procedure of choice for many gynecologists and urologists for treating SUI due to the good long-term results observed. It presents advantages such as, making smaller incisions and with better aesthetic results. There is easier access to space of Retzius with improved visualization of the surgical field. There is also minimal intraoperative blood loss and lower requirement of analgesics in the postoperative period.  In addition, there is lower cost, shorter hospital stay and rehabilitation period in many patients. Many authors describe cure rates for laparoscopic Burch surgery similar to those obtained with open technique, however with comparatively shorter follow-up [13].

         The trial of Paraiso et. al. demonstrates that there was significant subjective improvement and patient satisfaction after both laparoscopic Burch colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape procedure. However, TVT resulted in significantly greater subjective cure rates for stress incontinence than the laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. Additionally, more subjects demonstrated urodynamic stress incontinence during urodynamics after one year of surgery in the LBC group than in the TVT group (absolute risk increase 15.6%, P 0.056). Multiple outcome measures were analyzed and confirmed the superior efficacy of the TVT procedure. But the significant difference in cure rates does not necessarily imply that TVT is a superior procedure to the laparoscopic Burch colposuspension because patient satisfaction was equally high in both groups. It does seem that the patients in the laparoscopic Burch group were subjectively happier than their urodynamic studies indicated. Most patients in the Burch group had significant improvements in number of urine leakage episodes and Urogenital Distress Inventory and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire scores [11].

         After 1 year of follow-up, the TVT procedure was associated with significantly better results, both objectively and subjectively in the study of Valpas et.al. Subject satisfaction was better after the TVT procedure than after laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. In addition, the TVT procedure seems to be less invasive and requires fewer hospital resources than laparoscopic colposuspension [10].

         Persson et al, compared tension-free with laparoscopic colposuspension in their study, in which 2 single-bite nonabsorbable sutures were placed on each side of the urethra. At 1-year follow-up, there was no difference between the objective and subjective cure rates. It was also calculated that the TVT procedure was significantly more costly than laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. Sensitivity analyses showed that surgical time and anesthesia fees were major cost-deciding factors. It was stated that, while performing the TVT procedure, the full attention of the anesthesiologist was focused on sedation and the possible conversion of local anesthesia to general anesthesia should be anticipated [14].

         Adile et. al. also made a study on the cost effectiveness of the two procedures. They found that the mean hospital cost of TVT is lower than the one of LB. The learning curve for the surgeons is longer for the laparoscopic Burch suspension [19].

         Ward et.al. noted that operative complications, like bladder injury, were common with vaginal tape, but the duration of hospital stay and return to normal activity were shorter than colposuspension. Colposuspension was associated with more postoperative complications, in particular delayed resumption of micturition and longer recovery [8].

         In the study of Nazli et. al, they concluded that tension free transvaginal tape has modified the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. The technique has gained popularity among urogynecologists because of its simplicity, low morbidity, less invasiveness and good short and long-term results. It remains the only effective ambulatory treatment of stress urinary incontinence [20].

         Despite all the conclusions derived from the gathered studies, Flock et al. found that there were large single and multicentre studies that indicate an increase in incidence of intraoperative blood loss of 1-2% during TVT procedure. Hematomas also developed in 2-4% of patients after surgery [25].

         It is worthy to take note that there are circumstances in which laparoscopic Burch colposuspension may be the procedure of choice, in spite of the superiority of tension-free vaginal tape procedure. These include the following: if the patient desires future pregnancy (because TVT is contraindicated by the manufacturer in this circumstance); the patient requires concomitant laparoscopic surgery, such as a paravaginal defect repair or gynecologic adnexectomy; the patient has an unrepaired inguinal hernia, has suspected bowel adhesions in the suprapubic area, or has a femoral-femoral bypass graft that would make the blind passage of TVT trocars into the retropubic space undesirable; or the patient does not desire or is allergic to polypropylene mesh [12].

         In summary, the tension-free vaginal tape procedure resulted in significantly greater subjective cure rates for urodynamic stress incontinence than did the laparoscopic Burch colposuspension in this review. However, patients in both groups were extremely satisfied with surgery after 2 years of follow-up.

         Up to present time, it is still unclear which is the best type of surgery to perform where there is concomitant prolapse, or where a previous continence operation has failed. It would seem sensible that all secondary procedures are carried out by an experienced urogynecologists as the success rates are reduced and complications increased. Before any of the newer procedures enter general practice they should be subjected to a vigorous randomized controlled trial of suitable power and follow-up period. At present such data are still lacking.

         And lastly, satisfaction rates were both equally high between the groups.  This supports the use of both procedures as acceptable surgical treatment for female urodynamic stress incontinence.

CONCLUSION

         This review of literature showed that tension-free vaginal tape outperformed laparoscopic Burch colposuspension in terms of postoperative continence rates. It indicates that TVT is a safer, easier, cost-effective and more effective mode of surgery for patients with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence as compared to LBC. Most of the studies had a lot of limitations and were of poor quality, both in terms of methodologic and clinical parameters. It therefore limits the strengths of the recommendations derived by this review.

 

REFERENCES:

[1]        Mishra, RK. Laparoscopic Management of Stress Incontinence.
Textbook of Practical Laparoscopic Surgery. First Edition. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, 2008: 316-319.

[2]     Vancaillie TG, Schuessler W: Laparoscopic Bladder Neck Suspension. J
                   Laparoendos Surg. 1991; 3:169-73.

[3]     Smith ARB, Vancaillie TG. Laparoscopic colposuspension. In: Sutton C,
 Diamond MP (eds), Endoscopic surgery for gynecologists. 2nd ed. WB Saunders Company, London, 1998: 325-33.

[4]     Petros P, Ulmsten U. An integral theory of female urinary incontinence:
                   experimental and clinical considerations [review]��. Acta Obstet
                   Gynaecol Scand Suppl 1990;153: 7–31.

[5]        Chung MK, Chung RP. Comparison of laparoscopic Burch and TVT          procedures for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in obese        women. JSLS. 2002;6:17-21.
[6]        Chung MK. Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Obese       Patients: Laparoscopic Burch vs. Tension-Free Vaginal Tape.    Laparoscopy.org. 2004.
[7]        Nilsson CG, Rezapour M, Falconer C. 7-year Follow-up of the Tension-
Free Vaginal Tape Procedure for Treatment of Urinary Incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104:1259-62.

[8]        Ward K, Hilton P, United Kingdom and Ireland Tension-Free vaginal
Tape Trial Group. Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence. BMJ 2002; 325:67-70.

[9]        Ward K, Hilton P, UK and Ireland TVT Trial Group. A Prospective
                        multicentre randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and
colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: Two-
year follow-up. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190:324-31.

[10]      Valpas A, Kivela A, Penttinen J, Kujansuu E, Haarala M et al. Tension
                        Free Vaginal Tape and Laparoscopic Mesh Colposuspension for
Stress Urinary Incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104:42-9.

[11]      Paraiso MFR, Walters M, Karram M, et al. Laparoscopic Burch
Suspension versus Tension-Free Vaginal Tape: A Randomized
Trial. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104:1249-58.

 

[12]   Paraiso MFR, Muir TW, Sokol AI. Are midurethral slings the gold
                   standard surgical treatment for primary genuine stress
                   incontinence? J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2002; 9:405–7.

[13]      Bezerra C, Rodrigues A, Seo A, et al. Laparoscopic Burch Surgery: Is
                        there any advantage in relation to Open Approach? International
                        Braz J Urol. 2004; 30:230-6.

[14]      Persson J, Teleman P, Eten-Bergquist C et al. Cost analyzes based on
                        a prospective, randomized study comparing laparoscopic
                        colposuspension with a tension-free vaginal tape procedure.
                        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81:1066-73.

[15]      Rardin CR, Kohli N, Rosenblatt PL et al. Tension Free Vaginal Tape:
                        Outcomes Among Women with Primary versus Recurrent Stress
                        Urinary Incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100:893-97

[16]      Novara G, Ficarra V, Boscolo-Berto R et al. Tension Free Mid Urethral
                        Slings in the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence:
                        A Systematic Review ans Meta-analysis of Randomized
                        Controlled Trials of Effectiveness. Eur Ass of Urology 2007; 663-79.

[17]      Cheon WC, Mak JHL, Liu JYS. Prospective Randomised Controlled
            Trial comparing Laparoscopic and Open Colposuspension.
            Hong Kong Med J 2003; 9:10-14.

[18]      Rae D, Hawthorn R, Ramsay I. Does Laparoscopic Burch
                        Colposuspension still have a role? Reviews in Gynecological
                        Practice 2002; 1:54-59.

[19]      Adile B, Granese R, Lo Blue A et al. A Prospective Randomized Study
                        comparing Laparoscopic Burch versus TVT: Short and Long
                        Term Follow-up.

[20]      Nazli H, Ali MA. Tension-Free Vaginal Tape and Female Stress Urinary
                        Incontinence. Our Initial Experience in Pakistan. J Ayub Med
                        Coll Abbottabad 2006; 18:77-9.

[21]   Kuuva N. Nilsson CG. Effects and Effectiveness of the Tension-Free
                   Vaginal Tape Procedure for Treatment of Female Stress Urinary
                   Incontinence. Helsinki 2006: 1-65.

[22]      Johnson H, Slack C. Evidence-based Management of Stress Urinary
                        Incontinence. Royal College of Obstetricians and
                        Gynaecologists 2005; 7:159-165.

[23]      Smith P, McCrery R, Appell R. Current Trends in the Evaluation and
                        Management of Female Urinary Incontinence. CMAJ
                        2006;175:1233-40.

[24]   Ghoniem G, Stanford E, Kenton K et al. Evaluation and Outcome
                   Measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence:
                   International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) Guidelines for
                   Research and Clinical Practice. Int Urogynecol J 2007; 19:5-33.

[25]   Flock F, Reich A, Muche R et al. Hemorrhagic Complications Associated
                   with Tension-Free Vaginal Tape Procedure. Obstet Gynecol 2004;
                   104:989-94.

[26]   Holroyd-Leduc J, Straus S. Management of Urinary Incontinence in
                   Women: Scientific Review. JAMA  2004; 291:986-95.

[27]      Lam AM, Rosen DMB. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for Urinary Stress Incontinence:
            Results from 109 consecutive     cases.Gynaecological Endoscopy 1997; 6(2):109-113.

[28]      Bai SW, Sohn WH, Chung DJ et al. Comparison of the Efficacy of
                        Burch Colposuspension, pubovaginal sling and tension-free
                        vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence. International
                        Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2005; 91(3):246-251.

[29]   Ustun Y. Is there a place of Laparoscopy in the Surgical Treatment of
                   Stress Incontinence? VIth Congress of the Turkish German
                   Gynecological Association. Archive of Gynecology and Obstetrics
                   2005.

     

 

SSLWorld Laparoscopy Hospital Uses Comodo SSL for Payment and Admission - DR RK Mishra

da Vinci Robotic Surgery
Contact Us | Term and Conditions | Privacy Policy | Campus Store
ISO 9001 - 2008 Institute with International Benchmarking and Certification
Last Editorial Review: October 7th 2011

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.