Page 8 - World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
P. 8

World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, May-August 2009;2(2):6-11
                                                     Piyush Singhania et al

            Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty: Our

            Experience in 15 Cases


            1                 2                    3
             Piyush Singhania,  Mukund G Andankar,  Hemant R Pathak
            1 Senior Resident, Department of Urology, BYL Nair Hospital, Flat No. 203, CitiHill View Apartments, Plot No. 13, Sector 19
            Nerul, Navi Mumbai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
            2 Associate Professor, Department of Urology, BYL Nair Hospital, Room No. 207, 2nd Floor, College Building
            Mumbai Central, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
            3 Professor and Head, Department of Urology, BYL Nair Hospital, Room No. 207, 2nd Floor, College Building
            Mumbai Central, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
            Correspondence: Piyush Singhania, Senior Resident, Department of Urology, BYL Nair Hospital, Flat No. 203, CitiHill View
            Apartments, Plot No. 13, Sector 19, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, Phone: 9324964818
            E-mail: piyushsnghn@yahoo.co.in





            Abstract                                           INTRODUCTION
            Objectives:  To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of  Surgical management of PUJ obstruction has recently been
            transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the treatment of  revolutionized by the introduction and widespread adoption of
            ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty has been  minimally invasive techniques as alternative to standard open
            shown to have a success rate comparable to that of the open surgical  reconstructive procedures in an effort to reduce the morbidity
            approach. We report the results of our first 15 cases of transperitoneal
            dismembered pyeloplasty.                           of the treatment. Initially, minimally invasive approaches
                                                               included antegrade and retrograde endoscopic endopyelotomy.
            Patients and methods: From August 2006 to September 2007, 15  Although these procedures are associated with relatively few
            patients underwent laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty for
            ureteropelvic junction obstruction. All patients underwent dismembered  complications, brief hospitalization and little disability, the
            pyeloplasty. All patients were followed with diuretic renography (DTPA  reported success rates are low (71 to 88%) as compared to an
            renal scan) at 3 months and 1year of follow-up and intravenous  open approach. Also these procedures have an increased risk
            urography at 1 year follow-up to assess the success of the surgery.  of hemorrhage (0 to 12%). 1
            Results:  Fourteen of the fifteen procedures were successfully  Traditional therapy of the obstructed ureteropelvic junction
            completed. The procedure was converted to open surgery in one  has been open reconstructive surgery (pyeloplasty). The long
            patient who had history of recurrent UTI and friable tissues which  term success rate of open pyeloplasty has been reported to be
                                                                                                 2
            were not holding the sutures. Crossing vessels were identified in 7 out  greater than 90% in adults and children.  Despite the high
            of 15 patients(46.7%) which required transposition of the ureter and  success rate, open pyeloplasty has the disadvantage of a loin
            pelvis before anastomosis. Four patients had associated calculus  wound and consequent increased morbidity and long
            disease and in 3 out of 4 patients the calculus was removed. Average  convalescence. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty was originally
            operating time was 3.75 hours (range 3 to 5 hours) and the mean  developed in an attempt to duplicate the results of open
            blood loss was 150 ml. Mean hospital stay was 5.5 days. Mean duration
            of analgesic use was 5.2 days. Postoperative complications included  pyeloplasty while simultaneously decreasing postoperative
            urinary peritonitis in one patient and suture granuloma in 2 patients. 14  morbidity. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty was first described in 1993
                                                                               3
            out of 15 patients(93.33%) showed definite improvement in renal  by Schuessler et al;  since then several groups have reported
                                                                             4-7
            function and drainage on radiographic evaluation.  its successful use. Although associated with greater technical
            Conclusion:  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) is a safe and effective  complexity and a steeper learning curve, in the hands of the
            minimally invasive treatment option that duplicates the principles and  experienced laparoscopic surgeons, it has been shown to
            techniques of definitive open surgical repair.The success rates  provide lower patient morbidity, shorter hospitalization and
            associated with LP are comparable to those of the gold standard,  faster convalescence with the reported success rate matching
            open pyeloplasty.                                  those of open pyeloplasty (90% or higher).
            Keywords:  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty, transperitoneal pyeloplasty,  In this study, we present our initial experience with
            retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty.                  laparoscopic pyeloplasty by transperitoneal approach,including

                                                              6
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13